Court Rules Founding Fathers Unconstitutional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4795b/4795b25bfb8b36373d119e70f23ea5c75a5a4f40" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8511/a85119de324704d5a49f064840189c3c491d3671" alt=""
The
case originated when Ima Bigot of Berkeley, California objected to an assignment
her son was given in his high school government class. He was to play the part of our first
president and deliver Washington’s Farewell Address to the class. “It’s offensive from beginning to end,” Ms.
Bigot said. “I can’t believe they would
subject our children to such blatant religious indoctrination.”
The
portion of Washington’s Address which was found to be especially troublesome is
found near its midpoint: “Of all the
dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion, and
Morality are indispensable supports. In
vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to
subvert these great pillars of human happiness.” “Can you believe this guy?” asked Bigot. “What does Washington know about
patriotism? All this God and country
stuff doesn’t mix. It’s just un-American.”
Writing
for the majority, circuit judge Stephen Reinhardt said, “The members of this court
have long held that to appeal to the Founding Fathers on legal questions is to
foist a religious point of view on matters of state, and of course we can’t
have that.”
The
ACLU hailed the decision. “We see this
as the huge step toward our ultimate goal, which is to see the court rule the
Constitution unconstitutional,” Shyster said.
Comments