Will atheism triumph in 2038?
Nigel
Barber wrote a piece this week for the Huffington Post in which he predicted
that atheism will defeat religion by the year 2038. He appeals to what he calls
“the existential security hypothesis” in order to make his case. This is the
idea that,
“as
people become more affluent, they are less worried about lacking for basic
necessities, or dying early from violence or disease. In other words they are
secure in their own existence. They do not feel the need to appeal to
supernatural entities to calm their fears and insecurities.”
Barber
studied data from the nine “most godless countries” (Belgium, Czech Republic,
Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United
Kingdom), specifically looking for each country’s GDP per capita when it made the
“atheist transition” (moving from majority religious to majority secular). He
discovered that on average the figure was $29,822. Then, applying current global
economic growth patterns, he arrived at 2035 as the pivotal year when the
average country will reach the same GDP per capita, and likewise make the
atheist transition. Using other similar measures, he arrived at the year 2041.
Averaging them out, he came to 2038.
His
analysis is, of course, much too simplistic. For one thing, he doesn’t factor
in a nation’s particular history and culture. Might it not be relevant that most
of the countries listed above as the “most godless” were already rapidly
trending toward secularism prior to World War II, and that most were decimated by the war? What impact did
the war have on the collective psyche of Europe, and how did it affect the
institutions that were rebuilt in its wake? The mood of despair that overtook continent
after the war (especially coming as soon as it did after WW I in a kind of
lethal one-two punch), as evidenced by the dominance of existential philosophy,
left many wondering where God was in it all—or if he was in fact anywhere.
Similar
things might be said about the national disillusionment that took place in
Japan as a result of a humiliating defeat and the divine emperor’s forced recantation
of his divinity. Foundational beliefs were overthrown by the outcome of the war.
And
of course none of Barber’s analysis even considers nations that have been
historically Muslim or Hindu. His his sample isn’t nearly large enough or diverse enough to draw such sweeping
conclusions based on a single criterion (GDP per capita).
Consider
the U.S. as a case in point. The GDP per capita in the U.S. has been well over the $29,822
mark since at least 1999, and yet 81 percent of Americans polled said that religion
is “very important” (55%) or “fairly important” (26%) in
their lives.
For
all the flaws in Barber’s post, it must be said that it is not altogether
without merit to suggest a correlation between rising prosperity and declining religious
commitment. Scripture itself makes the same point.
Take
care lest you forget the Lord your
God by not keeping his commandments and his rules and his statutes, which I
command you today, lest, when you have eaten and are full and have built good
houses and live in them, and when your herds and flocks multiply and your
silver and gold is multiplied and all that you have is multiplied, then your
heart be lifted up, and you forget the Lord
your God (Deut. 8:11-14a).
But
Jeshurun grew fat, and kicked;
you
grew fat, stout, and sleek;
then
he forsook God who made him
and
scoffed at the Rock of his salvation (Deut. 32:15)
See
also Proverbs 30:9; Hosea 13:6.
Moses
and the prophets and apostles—not to mention preachers throughout the ages—have
pointed out the tendency of people to turn away from God when they grow
wealthy. They are tempted to a sense of false security (1 Tim. 6:17). Perhaps
we should congratulate Barber for finally catching up and noticing what
believers have known for millennia. His error lies in assuming the tendency is
an inevitability. Whether rising prosperity will lead to a secular majority in
any particular country or not (regardless of all other factors), and what the
precise tipping point might be remains to be seen.
Comments